Comments on: Change for the Sake of Change http://jameystegmaier.com/2010/01/change-for-the-sake-of-change/ Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:30:29 +0000 hourly 1 By: jameystegmaier http://jameystegmaier.com/2010/01/change-for-the-sake-of-change/#comment-2361 jameystegmaier Fri, 29 Jan 2010 03:55:24 +0000 http://jameystegmaier.com/?p=1856#comment-2361 Lisa, I love it! That's amazing. I don't necessarily have a timeline (at this point, I really don't have much stuff), but I go to Goodwill with a few bags about once a year. Aren't you amazed at the stuff you accumulate but never use? I really like the idea of getting rid of DVD cases. I hardly ever watch my DVDs but have had trouble parting with them, but perhaps a better solution is just to get a 3-ring DVD binder and get rid of all the cases. Brilliant! Lisa, I love it! That’s amazing. I don’t necessarily have a timeline (at this point, I really don’t have much stuff), but I go to Goodwill with a few bags about once a year. Aren’t you amazed at the stuff you accumulate but never use?

I really like the idea of getting rid of DVD cases. I hardly ever watch my DVDs but have had trouble parting with them, but perhaps a better solution is just to get a 3-ring DVD binder and get rid of all the cases. Brilliant!

]]> By: Lisa http://jameystegmaier.com/2010/01/change-for-the-sake-of-change/#comment-2360 Lisa Fri, 29 Jan 2010 03:50:10 +0000 http://jameystegmaier.com/?p=1856#comment-2360 Here's a time I have a timeline, and you (perhaps) don't. By the end of March I will have gotten rid of everything in my apartment that I can possibly get rid of... anything I haven't needed in the last year (wouldn't want to throw away summer clothes of course) or don't have a timeline for using. This is part of my intentionally single life - my room is a nightmare right now, but I'm up to 20 garbage bags of things I don't need going out the door. Why March? I started in December and it seemed like a do-able date. Clothes, old papers from school, books, leftover stationary, etc. I'm getting rid of the half-embroidered pillowcase and the empty scrapbook with lots of potential. The cases for the DVDs I have are all gone. No more extra power cords or anything. Instead of having a full storage unit and 4 sets of shelves with all my junk... storage unit is empty (except 2 boxes I'm still working on) and 2/4 shelves are full and being deconstructed for ridding. I love it. I echo change for the sake of change (I'm probably the queen of that in more ways than this) and all the benefits of that. I also looove getting rid of STUFF. So freeing. Here’s a time I have a timeline, and you (perhaps) don’t. By the end of March I will have gotten rid of everything in my apartment that I can possibly get rid of… anything I haven’t needed in the last year (wouldn’t want to throw away summer clothes of course) or don’t have a timeline for using. This is part of my intentionally single life – my room is a nightmare right now, but I’m up to 20 garbage bags of things I don’t need going out the door. Why March? I started in December and it seemed like a do-able date.

Clothes, old papers from school, books, leftover stationary, etc. I’m getting rid of the half-embroidered pillowcase and the empty scrapbook with lots of potential. The cases for the DVDs I have are all gone. No more extra power cords or anything. Instead of having a full storage unit and 4 sets of shelves with all my junk… storage unit is empty (except 2 boxes I’m still working on) and 2/4 shelves are full and being deconstructed for ridding.

I love it. I echo change for the sake of change (I’m probably the queen of that in more ways than this) and all the benefits of that. I also looove getting rid of STUFF. So freeing.

]]> By: T-Mac http://jameystegmaier.com/2010/01/change-for-the-sake-of-change/#comment-2359 T-Mac Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:04:49 +0000 http://jameystegmaier.com/?p=1856#comment-2359 C'mon, author friends of Jamey. I know you've read this. I'm genuinely curious about your answers! You're all creative people! C’mon, author friends of Jamey. I know you’ve read this. I’m genuinely curious about your answers! You’re all creative people!

]]> By: jameystegmaier http://jameystegmaier.com/2010/01/change-for-the-sake-of-change/#comment-2358 jameystegmaier Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:06:40 +0000 http://jameystegmaier.com/?p=1856#comment-2358 I see what you're saying. On a large scale, it's not like you can reorganize a company or a factory every few years. That would create consistent chaos, not a pattern trending towards efficiency and production. And some changes don't make sense. I can think of a former company that I may or may not have worked for that spent hundreds of thousands of dollars rebranding the entire company (which simply amounted to changing a logo and some letterhead). To me, that seemed like a total waste of resources and time. So how do you keep it fresh without causing chaos or wasting resources or time? I think it really depends on the situation. Like with the example of changing chairs in a staff meeting. That wouldn't work in a huge conference hall. But when you have 12 employees, it works just fine (at least, I think it does. I've never tried it). This is a non-answer here, but I thought your comment was worth replying to. Any other thoughts? I see what you’re saying. On a large scale, it’s not like you can reorganize a company or a factory every few years. That would create consistent chaos, not a pattern trending towards efficiency and production. And some changes don’t make sense. I can think of a former company that I may or may not have worked for that spent hundreds of thousands of dollars rebranding the entire company (which simply amounted to changing a logo and some letterhead). To me, that seemed like a total waste of resources and time.

So how do you keep it fresh without causing chaos or wasting resources or time? I think it really depends on the situation. Like with the example of changing chairs in a staff meeting. That wouldn’t work in a huge conference hall. But when you have 12 employees, it works just fine (at least, I think it does. I’ve never tried it).

This is a non-answer here, but I thought your comment was worth replying to. Any other thoughts?

]]> By: T-Mac http://jameystegmaier.com/2010/01/change-for-the-sake-of-change/#comment-2357 T-Mac Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:21:34 +0000 http://jameystegmaier.com/?p=1856#comment-2357 Great post! This is right up my alley at work. Change (improvement) can be a wonderful thing, but there are 2 potential negatives that aren't overtly mentioned here. (1) Acceptance. Sweden might not have had to deal with this because the roadside change was a government mandate, but when you make a major change, how are you going to get people to buy in? Any change is more productive if your people understand why it's happening. I'm guessing Sweden was able to provide some type of answer to the "why" question. Hopefully they didn't just decide one day to switch the side of the road people drive on. (2) Sustaining. This is the biggest problem I face in organizational change (and it seems like Sweden faces it too). You noted that accident rates went back up after a few years. Similarly, when positive organizational change takes place, one has to find a way to "keep it fresh". We emphasize it all the time in my job, and it's an issue we don't always have a good answer for (for those of you who don't know, when I'm not doing something immature like pole dancing or selling children in South America, I moonlight as an organizational empowerment specialist). Without a good structure put in place to sustain the positive aspects of change, your acccident rates go back up, your fulfillment levels go back down--your progress is relegated to yesterday's news and forgotten about. For me, the biggest question then is this: How do we "keep it fresh"? What innovative ideas do Jamey's amazing (and I mean that) readers have for sustaining the positive impact of change? I'd love your feedback! Great post! This is right up my alley at work. Change (improvement) can be a wonderful thing, but there are 2 potential negatives that aren’t overtly mentioned here. (1) Acceptance. Sweden might not have had to deal with this because the roadside change was a government mandate, but when you make a major change, how are you going to get people to buy in? Any change is more productive if your people understand why it’s happening. I’m guessing Sweden was able to provide some type of answer to the “why” question. Hopefully they didn’t just decide one day to switch the side of the road people drive on. (2) Sustaining. This is the biggest problem I face in organizational change (and it seems like Sweden faces it too). You noted that accident rates went back up after a few years. Similarly, when positive organizational change takes place, one has to find a way to “keep it fresh”. We emphasize it all the time in my job, and it’s an issue we don’t always have a good answer for (for those of you who don’t know, when I’m not doing something immature like pole dancing or selling children in South America, I moonlight as an organizational empowerment specialist). Without a good structure put in place to sustain the positive aspects of change, your acccident rates go back up, your fulfillment levels go back down–your progress is relegated to yesterday’s news and forgotten about. For me, the biggest question then is this: How do we “keep it fresh”? What innovative ideas do Jamey’s amazing (and I mean that) readers have for sustaining the positive impact of change? I’d love your feedback!

]]>