How Do You Feel About Sports with No Spectators?

I’ve always viewed professional and collegiate sports as entertainment, nothing more. But I have to say that I miss that form of entertainment. I miss checking ESPN for soccer scores and basketball highlights. I miss fantasy baseball. And I’m worried that I’ll have to miss football this fall.

Of course, preventing the spread of the pandemic is far more important than watching balls being kicked and thrown. Any professional or high-level collegiate sport requires hundreds of people to coordinate and broadcast–even if they’re the only people in the stadium, they cannot socially distance from each other.

But on several levels, it’s surprised me to hear that some athletes have said that it’s not a sport of there are no fans. First, most games are played without the majority of their fans in attendance. “Spectators” is a better word. Second, I’m sure even the most elite athlete has played games without spectators (they’re practices, pick-up games). Yes, it’s more exciting to have 20,000 people cheering for you in person, but that doesn’t nullify the nature of sport.

It appears that there are a growing number of fans who would gladly watch sports at home even if stadiums are empty. ESPN’s latest poll showed that 76% of participants would support the return of sports if the players, crew, and support staff were protected from infecting each other.

All of that said, I can see how athletes are the most entertaining when they can hear and see the fans. So why not make that happen? Install a videoconferencing device on every seat in the stadium. A fan can buy a ticket to the game to have access to the device–they can watch the game through it, and as they cheer for the game, the players on the court/field can see their face and hear their cheers.

Sure, some fans might abuse this, but there’s software to detect nudity and obscenities (perhaps far better than spectators). It would cost quite a bit to install such a system, but who knows how long this pandemic will last. It could be well worth the investment.

I’m curious what you think. Which sports do you miss the most? Would you watch them even without spectators in the stadium? What do you think about my virtual spectator idea?


2 Responses to “How Do You Feel About Sports with No Spectators?”

  1. Brent and Daisy says:

    The only sport I really follow and attend is the United Sportscar Championship,aka endurance racing. When watching the broadcast, you typically don’t see the fans anyway. Even while attending, you can find secluded sections of the track with no other spectators. I know they coined the phrase specutainment for it, but I’m not so sure spectators are required. With it being such an international sport, with some drivers not even speaking English, spectating every race was never really possible for most. There’s no such thing as a home race. I could see it being done without spectators, but the nature of cramped pits and the crew don’t really make it safe anyway.

    Luckily, they’ve set up an iRacing series where the drivers race at home, in their simulation rigs. No spectators other than family in person, but many watching the livestream, complete with commentary. Unfortunately, they haven’t quite figured out some of the things that make the racing great, like driver changes. If this way of racing continues, they just might however…

  2. Mary Gahagan says:

    Theatre is my sport and boy do I miss it. I have to agree about there not being spectators, in my case an audience. I love the whole rehearsal process but there is nothing like watching and hearing the audiences reactions to the performance. I won’t miss baseball or football season, but I live in Massachusetts and a lot of people here will miss it tremendously.

Leave a Reply